Insurance fraud is a very popular context in which the mail and Wire fraud statutes are applied. In fact, most insurance fraud, including Medicare Fraud and Medicaid Fraud, is prosecuted under the mail fraud or wire fraud statute. Any mailing of any application or proceeds between the insured and the insurer, agent, or office will confer federal jurisdiction under the statute. The easy case is where an insured commits arson in order to collect the insurance proceeds. In filing the claim, the insured can reasonably foresee use of the mails, and the remaining elements of mail fraud are easily satisfied. A more difficult situation is when the mailing occurs well after payment of the alleged loss. Here the issue is with the “in furtherance of the scheme” requirement – was the scheme over or still in effect? Prosecutors will argue that the scheme was still in effect, often characterizing such late mailings as attempts to “lull” current victims or give an appearance of normalcy to potential victims.
© 2024 by Boles Holmes White, LLC. All rights reserved. Disclaimer | Site Map
The criminal defense team of Boles Holmes White, LLC defends clients nationwide on state and federal charges, and in federal criminal appeals. We have represented the accused in Birmingham, Dothan, Mobile, Montgomery, Austin, Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, Miami, Memphis, Tampa, Pensacola, Orlando, Jacksonville, Tallahassee, Jackson, Mobile, Huntsville, Tuscaloosa, Atlanta, Los Angeles, Tucson, Detroit, New York, Cleveland, Baton Rouge, Charlotte, throughout Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Florida, Texas, New York and Tennessee, and across the United States.
These recoveries and testimonials are not an indication of future results. Every case is different, and regardless of what friends, family, or other individuals may say about what a case is worth, each case must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances as they apply to the law. The valuation of a case depends on the facts, the injuries, the jurisdiction, the venue, the witnesses, the parties, and the testimony, among other factors. Furthermore, no representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.